Бидний тухай
Багш ажилтан
ИХ-ийн тусгай ангийн гэрээний зохицуулалт ба хэрэгжилтийн үнэлгээ, үр дүн
Abstract In many developing countries, where the administrative bodies are not well established as western countries, the participation of public prosecutor in the Civil Proceedings is considered as a process-economic way to compensate the damages of state and individuals. Art.31 of Mongolian CPL rules the participation of public prosecutor in the civil process. From a comparative view, the role of prosecutor does not welcome its participation in civil procedure. The involvement of the public prosecutor in civil proceedings may be questionable on rule of law grounds, especially when considering the principles of judicial independence and the separation of the public prosecutor's office and the civil justice system. In civil proceedings, the focus is on the rights and interests of the parties involved, and the public prosecutor's office has traditionally had a different role, focusing on the prosecution of criminal offences. If the public prosecutor intervenes in civil disputes, this could affect the neutrality of the proceedings and call into question the principle of fair trial. The pros and contras for such regulations through simple procedural law should be carefully examined to ensure that the principles of the rule of law are upheld. But these concerns from the Rule of Law Perspective can be justified through the lack of some institutions in developing countries. So, general assignment of prosecutor role in civil procedure is to examine in it’s historical developments and in compliance with the rule of law principles. The case groups behind it, can be serve as a justification of it. As conclusion, it will consider the justifications in timely manner from the view of state capacity.
Abstract In many developing countries, where the administrative bodies are not well established as western countries, the participation of public prosecutor in the Civil Proceedings is considered as a process-economic way to compensate the damages of state and individuals. Art.31 of Mongolian CPL rules the participation of public prosecutor in the civil process. From a comparative view, the role of prosecutor does not welcome its participation in civil procedure. The involvement of the public prosecutor in civil proceedings may be questionable on rule of law grounds, especially when considering the principles of judicial independence and the separation of the public prosecutor's office and the civil justice system. In civil proceedings, the focus is on the rights and interests of the parties involved, and the public prosecutor's office has traditionally had a different role, focusing on the prosecution of criminal offences. If the public prosecutor intervenes in civil disputes, this could affect the neutrality of the proceedings and call into question the principle of fair trial. The pros and contras for such regulations through simple procedural law should be carefully examined to ensure that the principles of the rule of law are upheld. But these concerns from the Rule of Law Perspective can be justified through the lack of some institutions in developing countries. So, general assignment of prosecutor role in civil procedure is to examine in it’s historical developments and in compliance with the rule of law principles. The case groups behind it, can be serve as a justification of it. As conclusion, it will consider the justifications in timely manner from the view of state capacity.
Монгол Улсын Үндсэн хууль нь хууль тогтоомжийн дээд эх сурвалж бөгөөд улсын бүхий л салбарт, тэр дундаа хувийн эрх зүйд чухал нөлөө үзүүлдэг. Энэхүү илтгэлээр Үндсэн хуулийн хувийн эрх зүй дэх үүрэг, нөлөөг тодорхойлох, жишээгээр баяжуулан тайлбарлах зорьсон. Үндсэн хуулийн зарим тодорхой заалтыг сонгон авч, эдгээр заалтууд хувийн эрх зүйн аль салбарт хэрхэн нөлөөлдөг болохыг нарийвчлан тайлбарлах явцад тухайн эрхийг хэрэгжүүлэхтэй холбоотой процессын механизм, хууль тогтоомжийг судлах ба цөөн тооны практик жишээг авч үзнэ. Энэ хүрээнд Үндсэн хууль ба хувийн эрх зүйн харилцан хамаарлыг ерөнхийд нь дүгнэх ба хувийн эрх зүйн хэм хэмжээг ҮнХ-д нийцэж буй эсэхийг хянах тогтолцоог боловсронгуй болгох нь хувийн эрх зүйн хурдацтай хөгжилтэй зэрэгцэж хөгжих нөхцөл хэмээн дүгнэв.
In many developing countries, where the administrative bodies are not well established as western countries, the participation of public prosecutor in the Civil Proceedings is considered as a process-economic way to compensate the damages of state and individuals. Art.31 of Mongolian CPL rules the participation of public prosecutor in the civil process. From a comparative view, the role of prosecutor does not welcome its participation in civil procedure. The involvement of the public prosecutor in civil proceedings may be questionable on rule of law grounds, especially when considering the principles of judicial independence and the separation of the public prosecutor's office and the civil justice system. In civil proceedings, the focus is on the rights and interests of the parties involved, and the public prosecutor's office has traditionally had a different role, focusing on the prosecution of criminal offences. If the public prosecutor intervenes in civil disputes, this could affect the neutrality of the proceedings and call into question the principle of fair trial. The pros and contras for such regulations through simple procedural law should be carefully examined to ensure that the principles of the rule of law are upheld. But these concerns from the Rule of Law Perspective can be justified through the lack of some institutions in developing countries. So, general assignment of prosecutor role in civil procedure is to examine in it’s historical developments and in compliance with the rule of law principles. The case groups behind it, can be serve as a justification of it. As conclusion, it will consider the justifications in timely manner from the view of state capacity.
Abstract Problem and Purpose: The brief introduction to Mongolian Civil Procedure Law (=CPL) in this article aims to evaluate pros and contras of the main reforms in the CPL since enacting the Constitution of 1992, the Civil Code and the CPL itself in 2002. The researchers held the transition from socialist law system into continental law tradition based on liberalism and social state successfully accomplished. But a fundamental reorganization of the legal system has not reached yet, especially the development of civil procedure rules and principles shows that the structure, style, ideological model and transitional regulations of the previous laws interacted with the new norms, methods and mechanisms of the reform, thereby influencing the formation of a mixed model in the legal environment. Methods: So, the main reforms and the further need for reforms will be discussed here under the spotlight of mixture of those legal methods which are persistent in the CPL of Mongolia from a comparative view to the old system. In comparison to the western countries, Mongolia faces many difficulties in the procedural law field caused by transition and rapid development of the environment. Results: The reform process did not stop at reforming the legal environment, but rather changed the regulatory structures of received norms, which led to a mixed structure that combined old and new in Mongolia. Generally, the judicial reform in Mongolia from 2021 has reached its goals and ended with new definition of Supreme court power. The digitalization of the justice is a continuous process, which arises the problems of digital evidence etc. In order to simplify the judiciary, the inclusion of low-cost case resolution procedure in CPL instead of dunning procedure shows that model procedures or class action models will come to good to the willingness of the Mongolian legislator to reform. Conclusion: Civil procedural law must not remain as resistant to reform as substantive law in order to be in line with new developments of technology and the economy so that participants in economic transactions can exercise their procedural rights in a timely manner. In this regard, new expected reforms are welcome, even institutes from different legal families can be transformed into domestic law, especially since the two major legal families have developed closely together.
Энэхүү өгүүллийн хүрээнд ҮнХ (=Үндсэн Хууль), үндсэн хуульчилсан хууль, ердийн хуулиудыг ялгах эрх зүйн онолын шалгуурыг судлахын сацуу тэдгээрийн практик ач холбогдлыг макро харьцуулалтын аргаар авч юм. ҮнХ, үндсэн хуульчилсан хууль, ердийн хуулиудыг ялгах тухай хэм хэмжээний эх сурвалжийн онол, түүний шат дараалсан бүтцийн хамаарал нь дан ганц хууль тогтоох хүрээнд яригдах бус, үүнийг шүүхийн практикаар амилуулж, тогтмол шинэчилж байх ёстой тул дотоодын хууль хэрэглээнд тулгамдаж буй хэм хэмжээний шатлалын бэрхшээлтэй асуудлыг ҮнХ-ийн хяналт, үндсэн эрхийн хамгаалалтын тогтолцоотой уялдуулан судлах шаардлагатай. Энэ холбоо хэр нягт байгаагаас тухайн орны засаглалын индекс болон эрх зүйн хөгжлийн түвшнийг тодорхойлдог. Судалгааны үр дүнд хэм хэмжээний хяналтын тогтолцоо зарим талаар дутмаг байх нь хэм хэмжээний шаталсан бүтцийг цогцлооход саад болж буй нь харагдлаа. Abstract: In the framework of this article, while studying the legal theoretical criteria for distinguishing the Constitution, constitutional law, and ordinary laws, their practical importance is taken by the method of macro comparison. The theory of the source of norms on the distinction between the Constitution, the constitutional law, and ordinary laws, and its hierarchical structural relationship, should not be discussed only in the legislative framework, but should be brought to life by judicial practice and updated regularly. it is necessary to study the issue in connection with the system of constitutional control and protection of fundamental rights. How close this relationship is determines the country's governance index and level of legal development. As a result of the research, it was seen that the lack of a norm control system hinders the development of a hierarchical structure of norms.
Abstract Concepts of unity of law and unified application of law were the main goals of the revised version of Mongolian Judiciary Law in 2021 based on changes of Constitution in 2019. Constitutional Court decided that some provisions of the Law on the Courts of Mongolia, the Law on Administrative Litigation, the Law on Criminal Procedure, and the Law on Civil Litigation violated the relevant provisions of the Constitution of Mongolia. Those provisions related to the scope of the Supreme Court of Mongolia. Therefore is to examine the grounds for not complying with the Constitution of Mongolia mainly based on civil procedure matters and from a comparative view. Keywords Implications of the Revised Version of Mongolian Judiciary Law on the Scope of the Supreme Court after the Changes of Constitution in 2019, Civil
Монгол Улсын Иргэний Хуулийн уламжлал ба цаг үеийн шаардлага Бат-Эрдэнийн Буянхишиг, МУИС-ийн Хууль Зүйн сургуулийн ахлах багш, хууль зүйн доктор Хураангуй агуулга: I. Монгол Улсын Иргэний хууль, түүний чиг үүрэг, нөлөө II. Уламжлал / гарал үүсэл: социалист ба либерал загваруудын дуализм III. Цаашдын шинэчлэлд тавигдах шаардлага 1. Зохицуулах харилцаан дахь бодит өөрчлөлтүүд 2. Нийгэм-эдийн засаг, эрх зүйн үүднээс тавих шаардлага IV. Дүгнэлт
Шүүхийн тухай хууль ИХШХШтХ, ЗХШХШтХ, ЭБШХ-ийн 2021 оны нэмэлт өөрчлөлтийн агуулга, үр нөлөө
Иргэний процессын зарчим, хуулийн өөрчлөлт
Арилжааны бүртгэл versus Хуулийн этгээдийн бүртгэл I. Overview of the company and trade laws in Mongolia II. Process of foundation of companies III. Commercial registration system IV. The regulation for the companies V. The problems of these laws
Эдийн засгийн анализ хийх дараалал
