Бидний тухай
Багш ажилтан
Within the framework of this research, the authors’ objective is summarize their analysis of Mongolian parliament, introduce the country’s political parties’ and their versions of constitutional governance, as well as the public opinions, and explain the advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary and presidential systems. With this respect, the authors provide explanations about the structure and organizational roles of the legislative, executive, and judicial powers on theoretical and practical backgrounds at the institutional and power levels, as the Mongolian parliament system is different from the classic parliament system. Because of state mechanism failures, more and more people are criticizing the current state structure, political system, and functioning of political institutions. In accordance with the social crisis deepening in Mongolia and demands of changes to the Constitution, competing political parties propose drafts of the Constitution. All political parties seem to have an interest in making some amendments, or entire changes, to the Constitution. This article features a combination of several different perspectives on Constitutional changes or amendments.
Within the framework of this research, we have set an objective to display a short summary of the analysis on Mongolian parliament, a brief introduction of political parties’ versions of governance in constitution, and tendencies of public opinions as well as explaining the advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary and presidential systems.
